Talk:Sales Algorithm/@comment-88.72.204.16-20130721215916/@comment-8961248-20130722085949

That would be because I had inverted the >9 and the <=9 cases. Now fixed, so it is indeed higher for 10 (1000/(100-35)= 15.4) than 8(1) and 7(0.686)

Nice catch ! (and that code is definitely hard to read correctly)