Thread:Refractionpcsx2/@comment-8961248-20130508214912/@comment-8961248-20130510110235

I'm still against preventing all edits from anons, mainly because that would be restraining much more than what we need.

I think we should have at least a couple of active admins, that could block abusive users and/or protect pages that need it.

I know that's putting possibly a lot of work on their shoulders, but having to revert changes is not the most annoying, it is users that do it again, against whom whe can't do anything, and we don't need anon blocking against that, we only need to make it easier to ban abusive users (imo)