Talk:Review Algorithm/1.4.4/@comment-77.239.253.103-20130503095313/@comment-8961248-20130503204438

"If you spent more than 40% of a phase on a goal < 0.8 : You mean the game will lie to you, like "focus on *** served it well" while in truth it did the opposite? "
 * Twice : q decreased by 0.2 * isMMO + good message

Nope, that one is indeed a typo, good catch !

For 2) well when you're programming you sometimes take into account situations that shouldn't happen becaus you thought about it in the moment

But since those values are before being clamped back between 1 and 10 it's not improbable that you would reach very high score with some extremely high tech+design scores

3) Good point, but there have already been confusions about the starting values of q in the past, so I fear that changing it now might lead to more confusion than anything else

4) no, because isMMO is actually 1 if it isn't an MMO, and 2 if it is. I guess the variable name I chose may not be the best.

Well that made sense at the time :/ it you have a better idea for the name, I think we'll take it